![]() ![]() That aside, while the joint simulation environment will not be ready to complete the certification testing for the F-35 until summer 2023, its simulation capabilities offer enough robustness that the service saw it as the alternative to the common synthetic training environment to facilitate the service’s virtual training objectives, Ryan said. “If the full-rate production decision occurs in 2023, we estimate that the program will have delivered 1,115 aircraft before finishing operational testing,” the report said, noting that could involve substantial costs to rectify flaws discovered in the final testing. The report noted that F-35 production has gone on for years despite JSE not being ready, and the aircraft not completing certification. Hence, the F-35’s Milestone C is years behind schedule, according to an April 2022 Government Accountability Office report, “F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Cost Growth and Schedule Delays Continue.” Like many aspects of the F-35 program, it is running four years behind schedule and is not yet capable of conducting the 64 trials necessary to certify the fighter. The JSE was designed to serve as a high-fidelity, virtual testbed to certify the capabilities of the F-35 so it could move into full-rate production. It already had most of what it needed in the joint simulation environment, or JSE, he said. However, earlier this year, the service determined it didn’t need to reinvent the propeller. “The idea there was to define the attributes and to do experimentation to understand the performance needs of a common environment, understand where those technical risks are, and develop capabilities to get after that environment,” he said. Last year, the service was looking to create a consortium with industry to inform the development of a common synthetic training environment based on SCARS, he said. The simulator common architecture requirements and standards initiative, or SCARS, is a sustainment effort designed to “incrementally establish open architecture for Air Force simulators,” which involves defined standards and common applications, software and hardware, he said. There are two major activities ongoing to boost the interoperability and functionality of simulators, he explained during an interview. Charles Ryan, senior materiel leader for the simulators division, agile combat support directorate, which is responsible for sustaining, modernizing and developing Air Force simulators and training devices. The Air Force today has some 2,400 virtual devices globally - used by the service and foreign partners - ranging from desktop trainers to full-motion simulators with 360-degree domes and aircraft cockpit hardware, said Col. That’s allowing the Air Force to transition more training from the real to the virtual world. ![]() In fact, it can yield important data on the capabilities of the aircraft and the pilot.Īdvances in technology are facilitating more detailed simulations of weapons and operating environments. But if that exercise takes place in a virtual environment, then there’s no harm in pushing the envelope. ![]() Carmel Veterans Service Center, produced in the OPTUM Podcast Studio, distributed via the Medicare Mentors Veterans Voice Podcast Channel, powered by Technology Partner, Colorado Computer Support and made possible in part by Supporting Partner, The WireNut Home Services.Exceeding the limits of an F-35 during a training exercise comes at a steep price: the loss of a pilot and an $80 million aircraft. ![]() The Veterans Voice presented by USAA is a service of Mt. In the book, you’ll follow the author’s journey through the principles that got her through her 24-year career in the high-stakes and high-risk world of aerial combat. In Flying in the Face of Fear: Lessons on Leading with Courage, former fighter pilot and retired Air Force Colonel Kim Campbell delivers an inspiring and practical discussion of leadership and decision-making. Campbell previews her extraordinary story.įlying in the Face of Fear by Kim "KC" Campbell While flying a mission over Iraq, her A-10 was hit by a surface to air missile - a moment she says was pivotal and that she's chronicled in her book, Flying in the Face of Fear. Her life as a pilot and Air Force officer changed when the planes hit the towers in 2001. Gaining entry, she went on to lead the corps of cadets and from there earned a coveted pilot slot. She was rejected by the Air Force Academy when she first applied but faced that challenge with persistence and determination. Kim Campbell, USAF RET, A-10 Warthog fighter pilot. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |